News

Lagos is not no man’s land: Rhodes Vivour attacks Obasa

Published

on

Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour, the Labour Party governorship candidate in Lagos State for the 2023 elections, has knocked the Speaker of the House of Assembly in the state, Hon Mudashiru Obasa for proposing to make laws that will protect the property rights of indigenes.

The Lagos speaker had his acceptance speech noted that Lagos is Yoruba Land, and its lawmakers will enact laws to protect the indigenes even if it means reversing the existing laws.

But in his reaction to the statement, Rhode-Vivour on Thursday via a Twitter post,said the Speaker will divide Lagos residents along ethnic lines with his proposed law.

He said: “By considering this regressive bill, the Speaker disregards the spirit of the Nigerian Constitution and perpetuates a discriminatory system that divides our society along ethnic lines.

Read Also: I don’t mind that senate under me was called ‘rubber stamp – Lawan

“The proposed bill undermines the principle of private ownership and could severely affect investment, economic growth, and overall prosperity in Lagos State. By considering such legislation, the Speaker is sending a damaging message to local and international investors, discouraging their participation and confidence in the state’s economy.”

According to the LP governorship candidate, such a law would discourage the participation of local and foreign investors in Lagos economy and therefore asked the Assembly to rather “protect heritage, historical sites, and traditional institutions from political vandalism.”

He also said, “The speaker of the house announced his intention to make laws to protect indigenes. ‘They will reverse the reversible’ I believe that the time for this ethnic dog whistling must come to an end. With an election that ripped our social fabric, it is time for healing.

“We expect a policy that compensates indigenes for lands seized by the government, education bursaries, and inclusion of an independent traditional institution in governance. Not threats to property rights enshrined in the constitution.”

Click to comment

Trending

Exit mobile version